This is the full book called the communist manifesto. If you decide to read it, keep in mind that it can be tied directly to Yuri Bezmenov, Russia, and his teachings on Ideological Subversion. This is the book that began it all for the communists.  Remember their goal in writing this is to take a nation, and make it so nobody has rights anymore.




 Manifesto of the Communist Party


A spectre is haunting Europe — the spectre of communism. All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and Tsar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and German police-spies.
Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as communistic by its opponents in power? Where is the opposition that has not hurled back the branding reproach of communism, against the more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its reactionary adversaries?
Two things result from this fact:
I. Communism is already acknowledged by all European powers to be itself a power.
II. It is high time that Communists should openly, in the face of the whole world, publish their views, their aims, their tendencies, and meet this nursery tale of the Spectre of Communism with a manifesto of the party itself.
To this end, Communists of various nationalities have assembled in London and sketched the following manifesto, to be published in the English, French, German, Italian, Flemish and Danish languages.

Chapter I. Bourgeois and Proletarians

The history of all hitherto existing society(2) is the history of class struggles.
Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master(3) and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.





Watch as this patriots 1st amendment rights are being violated. Notice this is coming from a home movie camera, NOT mainstream news. What is this country coming to? How many other times has this happened? This video should be all over mainstream news.To be frank, this video really pisses me off!


Remember, my ideological subversion is another series of seven videos, he describes ideological subversion in great detail.



7 Topics Americans Juuuust wont talk about

I found this article on right wing Read it, its a good one.

In a world where politics has become all-consuming and there's an interest group looking for an opportunity to exploit every issue, it has become almost impossible to have adult conversations about certain subjects. The moment you try to do so, legions of grievance mongers, ideologues and bottom feeders start belting out scripted responses that have nothing to do with the topic at hand and everything to do with what they imagine your motivations to be and how ugly, stupid, and flawed they think you are as a human being.

What this means is that certain crucial issues never really get discussed in this country. Instead, we just end up with people insulting each other back and forth. That's too bad because these are not small matters. To the contrary, they're rather consequential and they deserve to be seriously discussed instead of treated like partisan footballs.

2) Illegal Immigration: If you try to discuss the problems associated with illegal immigration, the only response is, "You just don't want Hispanics here!" That's really shorthand for, "We don't ever want to have a real discussion about the issue." Here's the simple reality: Because we have so many poor Hispanic countries near our southern border, the majority of illegal immigrants in this country is ALWAYS going to be Hispanic. We can never seem to get past that fact to really talk about all the other issues associated with illegal immigration. For example, are illegal immigrants putting Americans out of work? Are they driving down salaries that American workers are paid? If we allow illegals in the country to have citizenship, won't that just encourage more illegal immigrants to come here? Does it really make sense to allow millions of manual laborers, most of whom are poor and uneducated, to become American citizens who'll be eligible for welfare, food stamps, and Social Security? Wouldn't that just be importing poverty into the country? Are the millions of illegals in this country actually changing our culture for the worse? Should we put an end to birthright citizenship for the children of two illegals? Could it actually be dangerous over the long term to have millions of people here who aren't loyal to the United States and believe they have a right to be here illegally because the southern United States is "stolen land?"



Here is a good video for those who dont like reading.......


For all the beautiful civil rights defenders, that think egypt is now a democracy, just because our mainstream media left, I have news for you it isn't. We've basically gone there made fools of ourselves and left, and another reason why our president should be impeached.  Since the president is currently claiming humanitarian issues regarding Libya, lets take a look below, and see how egypt made out after the wrath of Mr. Obama.  Here are some current news articles of Egypt around the end of March.  Well, its obvious now who is the big winner in Egypt.  If we dont wake up Obama will continue on his path of destruction.

Salafi: Anti-democracy flyers handed out in CAIRO     3/29/11

Gunmen attack oil well south of CAIRO        3/28/11       

Whats going on with the world?


With the finding of this video CNS  as just added another horrific element to the middle east disaster.  Apparently Iran is viewing these riots as the beginning of the end, when their profit will return to earth, and the whole world will be muslim. 

So with this in mind....I've noticed we have been aiding the terrorist in the middle east. How? Simple...if your sworn enemys goal is to kick someone out of power, wouldent you want to keep them in power? The terrorist goal is to kick Kadaffi (dont know the correct spelling) out of power, wouldn't our goal be to keep him in power, instead of trying to throwing him out?? Somthing is wrong with this picture....I would be scared to find out the absolute truth of this matter. That reminds me there was quote that went mainstream from a promenant official at the beginning of the egypt protests. Dont remember? Whom ever it was said something to the effect of? "Were seeing the first act of the first scene of a very long play"...?? Time for an impeachment before we loose this country.


  • Well, as some of us may know there was a series of leaked emails and information from the I.P.C.C. (the International Panel of Climate Change).  The I.P.C.C. apparently has been altering the data on climate change. The I.P.C.C. is where much of the "Global Warming" data we hear about comes from.  Now that we officially know their fraudulent, the only question left is.....why? Money? Power? Both? What do you think? 
  • Below are the main points from the hacked documents........
  • data had been altered to ‘hide cooling’
  • data had been forged to demonstrate a ‘warming trend’
  • Scientists lamented that their data did not demonstrate the conclusions they wanted:  this is nothing new.  What is new is that they sought advice from each other how to fiddle the data in order to hide what it shows and instead conform to their desired conclusion
  • Scientists threatened to destroy data rather than permit other scientists examine the un-altered dataset on which their study is based (this is an essential part of the peer review process – without examining the raw data, another scientist cannot possibly assess if it had been processed ‘correctly’:  it is unthinkable that a proper peer review could possibly be done without examining the raw data
  • Scientists knowingly passed only  the data that supported ‘Global Warming’ on to the IPCC panel for evaluation, suppressing existing data that opposed it.
  • Scientists intentionally manipulated ‘impartial’ scientists performing peer review on studies which had findings which did not support AGW/ACC point of view, tricking them into rejecting non-AGW/ACC supporting studies…


So why are the owners of the news so important? Well, the people who run the news play a key role in running the country. They basically dictate what people think. These companies and their owners need to be watched like hawks.

A&E Television Networks

ABC Television Network

Adams Business Media

Advance Publications, Inc.

Advanstar Communications Inc.

America Online (AOL)

American City Business Journals Inc.

American Media, Inc.

Belo Corporation

Bertelsmann AG

BNP Media

Boone Newspapers, Inc.

Cablevision Systems Corporation



This video shows, yet again, liberal ignorance of who they were voting for. I believe this video was shot on election day. It seems that American leaders love ignorance of their own people.


I cannot believe the ignorance in America today.  This audio clip is from Detroit.  Apparently a rumor was went around detroit a while back, and a bunch of people thought they were going to receive free money. Listen as these ignorant people talk to this reporter, and tell me how smart you feel afterwards.  Can a country survive with this type of political ignorance?

This second video is from cnbc. this lady actually took her children out of school, and after watching obama's speech, actually thought that obama was going to pay her car, gas, and mortgage. Again, can a country survive with this type of political ignorance? I also enjoyed her last sentence "If I help him, he's gonna help me"

This last video shows liberal's ignorance of the person they were voting for. AGAIN can we survive with type of political ignorance?





1. This is a universal health care bill.

The bill is neither universal health care nor universal health insurance.
Per the CBO:
  • Total uninsured in 2019 with no bill: 54 million
  • Total uninsured in 2019 with Senate bill: 24 million (44%)
2. Insurance companies hate this bill

This bill is almost identical to the plan written by AHIP, the insurance company trade association, in 2009. The original Senate Finance Committee bill was authored by a former Wellpoint VP. Since Congress released the first of its health care bills on October 30, 2009, health care stocks have risen 28.35%.
3. The bill will significantly bring down insurance premiums for most Americans.

The bill will not bring down premiums significantly, and certainly not the $2,500/year that the President promised.
Annual premiums in 2016, status quo / with bill:
Small group market, single: $7,800 / $7,800
Small group market, family: $19,300 / $19,200
Large Group market, single: $7,400 / $7,300
Large group market, family: $21,100 / $21,300
Individual market, single: $5,500 / $5,800*
Individual market, family: $13,100 / $15,200*
4. The bill will make health care affordable for middle class Americans.
The bill will impose a financial hardship on middle class Americans who will be forced to buy a product that they can’t afford to use. A family of four making $66,370 will be forced to pay $5,243 per year for insurance. After basic necessities, this leaves them with $8,307 in discretionary income — out of which they would have to cover clothing, credit card and other debt, child care and education costs, in addition to $5,882 in annual out-of-pocket medical expenses for which families will be responsible.
5. This plan is similar to the Massachusetts plan, which makes health care affordable. Many Massachusetts residents forgo health care because they can’t afford it. A 2009 study by the state of Massachusetts found that:

  • 21% of residents forgo medical treatment because they can’t afford it, including 12% of children
  • 18% have health insurance but can’t afford to use it
6. This bill provide health care to 31 million people who are currently uninsured.

This bill will mandate that millions of people who are currently uninsured must purchase insurance from private companies, or the IRS will collect up to 2% of their annual income in penalties. Some will be assisted with government subsidies.
7. You can keep the insurance you have if you like it.
The excise tax will result in employers switching to plans with higher co-pays and fewer covered services.
Older, less healthy employees with employer-based health care will be forced to pay much more in out-of-pocket expenses than they do now.
8. The “excise tax” will encourage employers to reduce the scope of health care benefits, and they will pass the savings on to employees in the form of higher wages.
There is insufficient evidence that employers pass savings from reduced benefits on to employees.
9. This bill employs nearly every cost control idea available to bring down costs.

This bill does not bring down costs and leaves out nearly every key cost control measure, including:
  • Public Option ($25-$110 billion)
  • Medicare buy-in
  • Drug reimportation ($19 billion)
  • Medicare drug price negotiation ($300 billion)
  • Shorter pathway to generic biologics ($71 billion)
10. The bill will require big companies like WalMart to provide insurance for their employees
The bill was written so that most WalMart employees will qualify for subsidies, and taxpayers will pick up a large portion of the cost of their coverage.
11. The bill “bends the cost curve” on health care.

The bill ignored proven ways to cut health care costs and still leaves 24 million people uninsured, all while slightly raising total annual costs by $234 million in 2019. “Bends the cost curve” is a misleading and trivial claim, as the US would still spend far more for care than other advanced countries.
In 2009, health care costs were 17.3% of GDP.
Annual cost of health care in 2019, status quo: $4,670.6 billion (20.8% of GDP)
Annual cost of health care in 2019, Senate bill: $4,693.5 billion (20.9% of GDP)
12. The bill will provide immediate access to insurance for Americans who are uninsured because of a pre-existing condition. Access to the “high risk pool” is limited and the pool is underfunded. It will cover few people, and will run out of money in 2011 or 2012 Only those who have been uninsured for more than six months will qualify for the high risk pool. Only 0.7% of those without insurance now will get coverage, and the CMS report estimates it will run out of funding by 2011 or 2012.
13. The bill prohibits dropping people in individual plans from coverage when they get sick. The bill does not empower a regulatory body to keep people from being dropped when they’re sick. There are already many states that have laws on the books prohibiting people from being dropped when they’re sick, but without an enforcement mechanism, there is little to hold the insurance companies in check.
14. The bill ensures consumers have access to an effective internal and external appeals process to challenge new insurance plan decisions. The “internal appeals process” is in the hands of the insurance companies themselves, and the “external” one is up to each state.
Ensuring that consumers have access to “internal appeals” simply means the insurance companies have to review their own decisions. And it is the responsibility of each state to provide an “external appeals process,” as there is neither funding nor a regulatory mechanism for enforcement at the federal level.
15. This bill will stop insurance companies from hiking rates 30%-40% per year.

This bill does not limit insurance company rate hikes. Private insurers continue to be exempt from anti-trust laws, and are free to raise rates without fear of competition in many areas of the country.
16. When the bill passes, people will begin receiving benefits under this bill immediately

Most provisions in this bill, such as an end to the ban on pre-existing conditions for adults, do not take effect until 2014. Six months from the date of passage, children could not be excluded from coverage due to pre-existing conditions, though insurance companies could charge more to cover them. Children would also be allowed to stay on their parents’ plans until age 26. There will be an elimination of lifetime coverage limits, a high risk pool for those who have been uninsured for more than 6 months, and community health centers will start receiving money.
17. The bill creates a pathway for single payer.

Bernie Sanders’ provision in the Senate bill does not start until 2017, and does not cover the Department of Labor, so no, it doesn’t create a pathway for single payer.
Obama told Dennis Kucinich that the Ohio Representative’s amendment is similar to Bernie Sanders’ provision in the Senate bill, and creates a pathway to single payer. Since the waiver does not start until 2017, and does not cover the Department of Labor, it is nearly impossible to see how it gets around the ERISA laws that stand in the way of any practical state single payer system.
18 The bill will end medical bankruptcy and provide all Americans with peace of mind.

Most people with medical bankruptcies already have insurance, and out-of-pocket expenses will continue to be a burden on the middle class.
  • In 2009, 1.5 million Americans declared bankruptcy
  • Of those, 62% were medically related
  • Three-quarters of those had health insurance
  • The Obama bill leaves 24 million without insurance
  • The maximum yearly out-of-pocket limit for a family will be $11,900 (PDF) on top of premiums
  • A family with serious medical problems that last for a few years could easily be financially crushed by medical costs



1. It Is Ridiculed.

2. It Is Violently Opposed.

3. It Is Accepted As Self-Evident.

– Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher

9/11 victims list

This is a copy of a long list of september 11th victims from fox news.

......CLICK READ MORE..........


Here is Glenn Beck on a segment called Crime Inc.  Beck explains a crime ring involving the following people/organizations:

- Barack Obama: THE PRESIDENT.


- John Podesta: The founder of the CAP/advisor to Obama.

 George Soros

- Petrobras: Brazil’s multi-billion dollar state-run oil company. Heavily invested in deepwater drilling, including a wells as deep as 7000 meters.

- British Petroleum (BP): Responsible for the ongoing oil spill disaster in the gulf due to the failure of a deepwater rig drilling at 1500 meters




After reading the brainwashing manuel, I noticed the words "America","United States", "Westernized" were used throughout.  So I counted the number of times each of these words was used.

AMERICA was used: 11 times
UNITED STATES was used: 10 times
THE WEST was used: 3 times

Now I will post the sentences these words were used in......

In the preceding editoral text:

""there actually were two American groups
in the field of mental science who were entirely above suspicion, particularly since they
were often mentioned as Soviet targets by my informers and were mentioned in the actual
text of this book as being antipathetic to this Soviet programme. These two groups were
the Christian Scientists and the Dianeticists. Christian Science is an American Religion,
intensely patriotic. Dianetics is the only entirely American development in the field of the
human mind.""

""If you care to check this subject of psychopolitics against current occurrences in the
American scene you will discover the urgency of such measures.""

In the chapters:

""American students at the Lenin University, I welcome your attendance at these classes on

""To achieve these goals the psychopolitician must crush every "home-grown" variety of
mental healing in America.""

""In a nation under conquest such as America, our slow and stealthy approach need take
advantage only of the cycle of booms and depressions inherent in Capitalistic nations in
order to assert more and more strong control over individual wills.""



Here are a number of  ways America's Illegal Immigration Problem could destroy us. A man named Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a speech on how to destroy America through Illegal Immigration. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States. He said, "If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'"

"Here is how they do it," Lamm said: "Turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country. History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual.....CLICK READ MORE BELOW.......

Liberalism/Communism/Socalism Defined

On the definition of LIBERALISM quotes:

""A political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.""


""A theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.""

""A system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party.""

""A theory or system of social organization  that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.""


Liberalism = Communism/Socalism

This article was found on  It describes the links between Liberalism and Communist/Socalist ideals, and relates them to those of our founding fathers.

Our Founding Fathers, being keenly attuned to the goal of personal freedom, accurately analyzed the manner in which freedom was so trampled by the political systems from which they had fled in Europe. Their genius was the recognition that tyranny must be expected from unfettered governmental power. How wise they were, to separate our government into three branches, such that each could keep an eye on the other two.......CLICK READ MORE BELOW


As I have stated in previous posts, its the duty of all Americans to know the enemy of our republic!  Here is an example of a website that seeks to turn youth into communist/socalist.  Keep in mind while reading, that the majority of this information is all lies, and is meant to condition  minds for an eventual take over.

Here is the site:

Democacys Vs. Republics

According to our pledge of allegiance America, is a Republic.  So what is the difference between a democracy, and a republic. Generally speaking, a democracy, can be a republic, and a republic can be a democracy  There is two huge differences.  These differences deal with the mindset of the people. First a republic involves heavy use of the constitution, and secondly personal rights are respected.

I found a good comparison/contract on wiki-answers......CLICK READ MORE BELOW


Below is the response to a question I found in yahoo answers.  It is the best for describing why communism doesn't work.

""Communism doesn't work because it fails to understand a principle of economics that everything is relative. If I say I am wealthy, what does that mean? Wealthy based on who's definition? I live in an apartment, I own a car, I have some money put away for retirement, etc. Not wealthy by western standards but if I were to take all that I have and move to Nigeria, I'd be very well off.
Additionally, if you try to make everyone rich, you only devalue the meaning of being rich and therefore you haven't made everyone rich, you've only made everyone the same level, which is usually poor.
Communism also fails to understand that people get to be wealthy not by stealing and cheating but by hard work. When you remove the incentive for someone to work hard because their efforts will be punished (taken by the state) then why will they work hard? They'll do the minimum because the results will be the same.

Communism as a theory looks great...its utopian...which is why it fails whenever practiced.

The original Jamestown colony functioned like a commune...and it failed miserably. Everyone received equal shares of food and material regardless of whether they worked or not and the colony almost collapsed because...surprise, people stopped working. The colony florished when people had to earn their keep by working.

Finally, Communism is flawed because the "ultimate goal" is a stateless society where everyone just lives in harmony and there is no need for government. This fails to realize that nature abhors a vacuum. If leadership is absent, someone will step up and take power. This is what Communists today do not understand when they say there has never been a true Communist state...there has but what always will happen is someone will role in and take power be they Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, you name it.

Communes are most successful when they exist inside a Capitalistic nation...ironic.""


This brainwashing manual was transcribed by Ron L. Hubbard, and typed by his daughter in law. This brainwashing manual discloses secret tactics used by communist/socalist to push their agenda. There is much scrutiny online as its authenticity. Some claim that because it not an original copy of a work, and came from someone's mind that it is not legitimate. Maybe communist Russian would not want to risk a manual falling into the hands of the enemy...who knows..decide for yourself......EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO READ THIS..........CLICK READ MORE BELOW:

Body Language

This a good video showing body language.  As we already probably know, body language is a huge part of speech.  Knowing how to judge body language can help you reach sensible conclusions about people, especially those who REPRESENT YOU!  Remember, politicians can be masters of deception.  Its up to us to elect responsible ones. While body language may not tell you everything, it may assist you in the process of canidate selection at the poles.

The video's below may help.

Rules for Radicals

 Okay, so who is saul Alinsky? Maybe we might ask a more important question "Where did he live?"  He lived in Chicago (1909 - 1979), and was a radical "Community Organizer".  Seems as if Mr. Obama, and other head liberals like Pelosi, and the Clintons take his advice to heart.  Below is a list from his book entitled "Rules for Radicals" Can you see any connection?

Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals

Here is the complete list from Alinsky......Click Read More Below........


F.I.R.E. stands for Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.

Its mission statement quotes ""The mission of FIRE is to defend and sustain individual rights at America's colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, legal equality, due process, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience — the essential qualities of individual liberty and dignity. FIRE's core mission is to protect the unprotected and to educate the public and communities of concerned Americans about the threats to these rights on our campuses and about the means to preserve them.""

F.I.R.E. is an extremely important organization.  It is helping stop the spread of  Un-American/Communist ideals which have infiltrated our education system.

Here is F.I.R.E.'s Guide to free speech on campus.........................




Al-Masry Al-Youm: Egypt: News FEED






------WORLD CLOCK------